Data Integration | CMS Blog Watch

Data integration

Lotus Knows, But Do You Know Lotus?

Posted in Content Management, Data integration, General vendor/market landscape, Information Management, Information Workplace, Information governance, Sheri McLeish, Social Computing, Ted Schadler, Workforce Technographics (R), collaboration on January 20th, 2010 by Sheri McLeish – Comments Off

Sheri-McLeish

by Sheri McLeish

First, thank you IBM/Lotus for getting me out of Boston before the snow. I know that has something to do with my good mood. But that aside, what Lotus unveiled at its 17th annual Lotusphere in Orlando this week warms my heart in another way. For all the advancements in its product portfolio and technologies, the real accomplishment is Lotus’ keen focus on people, context, and simplicity.

IBM wants us to have a Smarter Planet, and Lotus "Knows" how to get there. Its vision for collaboration is deeply connected to personal productivity. With LotusLive, launched just a year ago, the effort is to allow people to be able to stay in their in-box and bring work tasks, information, and people together, in context. It has 18 million users today compared to just about 1 million each for Microsoft’s Business Productivity Online Suite (BPOS) and Google Premier Apps. It’s landing more huge enterprise accounts, including the just announced more than 150,000 seats with Panasonic. Yet it still seems that many people don’t know Lotus, because most of my inquiries continue to ask about Microsoft or Google. Let me share.

So much of the iWorker’s day is spent searching for information, toggling between applications, and pulling content together from various sources to support a business activity or process. Unlike Google Wave, which does try to innovate to accomplish similar collaborative experiences, LotusLive doesn’t require radically altering behavior to get there (see Ted Schadler’s related Lotus blog). Email is an hourly addictionfor iWorkers, so LotusLive starts there and integrates Web conferencing, social networking, and collaboration within the environment.


Symphony, Lotus’ free Open Office productivity suite, will soon also be integrated to provide a web-based document document editor for creating and sharing (which surprisingly drew spontaneous cheers from the crowd).

Critical mass matters for the success of social networking and collaboration. So does trust and track record. IBM/Lotus meets the security litmus test because of its proven ability to support enterprise needs across its product portfolio. Google has yet to earn that trust. Microsoft engenders the same level of trust and is hot on the heels of Lotus with its 2010suite of products, slated to be launched midyear. But in the cloud, Lotus is way ahead and offering the kind of ease of access to people and content in context that Microsoft has yet to master. Consider:

  • iWorkers suffer from ADD. With plenty to distract iWorkers from their task at hand, people increasingly need help to compartmentalize their work to stay the course. Need to locate the latest sales numbers to put in your presentation to the board? This can trigger a investigation to find who has the latest information, how to best reach them, or perhaps to try and discover if the information is already documented elsewhere. LotusLive addresses these challenges by enabling easier connections to people and content through searching and social networking that don’t require switching applications. You can contact someone based on information published, through integration of a “business card” fed from Connections/SameTime, and escalate from a threaded discussion to voice, video, a meeting, and presence.
  • iWorkers need context. We know that information taken out of context is misleading. Value comes from understanding the genesis of information as well as its application in a given scenario. Because of the ability to filter by a lot of work dimensions, such as people, projects, time/date, or specific keyword searches, it’s much easier to surface content and people in relation to what your information needs are. With the ability to find sales numbers and also view related discussion threads or additional presentation materials or documents, greater understanding of the data is possible because more context is provided.
  • iWorkers want simple. Ok, I admit it, I am the epitome of the KISS principle. I really don’t adjust well to new technology. I’m lucky to have a husband that manages all of the electronics at home. But I do know good design. It’s simple. It’s clean. I don’t have to think about it. It’s intuitive. What LotusLive accomplishes is a strikingly simple UI that doesn’t force me to change my behavior. iWorkers will relish being able to do what they’ve always done and delight in the ease of discovering more content, more people, and ultimately, be more productive.

Given the concerted effort to solve iWorker pain points through actual use cases, within their core customer industries like banking and healthcare, Lotus is able to deliver what Google Wave fails to address: providing a solution that improves personal productivity without forcing a change in work behavior. The “build it and they will come” approach generally fails. Just look at any efforts around document collaboration and team sites usage. Incrementally improving upon the investments that you already have without forcing a cultural change, however, will be a powerful differentiator. Who knew? Lotus.

Lotus Knows, But Do You Know Lotus?

Posted in Content Management, Data integration, General vendor/market landscape, Information Management, Information Workplace, Information governance, Social Computing, Workforce Technographics, collaboration on January 19th, 2010 by Sheri McLeish – Comments Off

First, thank you IBM/Lotus for getting me out of Boston before the snow. I know that has something to do with my good mood. But that aside, what Lotus unveiled at its 17th annual Lotusphere in Orlando this week warms my heart in another way. For all the advancements in its product portfolio and technologies, the real accomplishment is Lotus’ keen focus on people, context, and simplicity.

Instrumenting Your Enterprise for Maximum Predictive Power

Posted in Business intelligence, Business process, Complex event processing, Content Management, Data integration, Data management, Data warehousing, Information Management, James G. Kobielus, James Kobielus, Predictive analytics/data mining, ZDNet on November 22nd, 2009 by James Kobielus – Comments Off

By James Kobielus

Business is all about placing bets and knowing if the odds
are in your favor.

As I noted in my most
recent Forrester report
, business success depends on your company being
able to visualize likely futures and take appropriate actions as soon as
possible. You must be able to predict future scenarios well enough to prepare
plans and deploy resources so that you can seize opportunities, neutralize threats,
and mitigate risks.

Clearly, predictive analytics can play a pivotal role in the
day-to-day operation of your business. It can help you focus strategy and
continually tweak plans based on actual performance and likely future scenarios.
And, as I noted in a recent
Forrester blog post
, the technology
can sit at the core of your service-oriented architecture (SOA) strategy as you
embed predictive logic deeply into data warehouses, business process management
platforms, complex event processing streams, and operational applications.

The grand promise of predictive analytics—still largely
unrealized in most companies—is that it will become ubiquitous, guiding all
decisions, transactions, and applications. For the technology to rise to that
challenge, organizations must move toward a comprehensive advanced analytics
strategy that integrates data mining, content analytics, and in-database
analytics. Already, we’ve sketched out a vision of “Service-Oriented Analytics,”
under which you break down silos among data mining and content analytics
initiatives and leverage these pooled resources across all business processes.

You may agree that this is the right vision but have doubt
about whether there is a practical, incremental roadmap for taking your company
in that direction.  In fact there is, and
it starts with re-assessing the core of most companies’ predictive analytics
capability: your data mining tools. As you plan your predictive analytics
initiatives, you should avoid the traditional approach of focusing on tactical,
bottom-up project-specific requirements. You should also try not to shoehorn your
requirements into the limited feature set of whatever modeling tool you
currently happen to use.

To become a fully predictive enterprise, you will need to take
both a top-down and bottom-up approach to your data mining initiatives. From
the top-down, it’s all about building and integrating alternate models of how
your business environment is likely to evolve internally and externally. In our
recent report on advanced analytics
, Boris Evelson, Leslie Owens, and I
sketched out the many business processes that can be enriched by predictive
analytics.

So how do you instrument your company to become more
predictive? For starters, assess whether your analytics tools support the
following capabilities for developing, validating, and deploying predictive models:

  • Model multiple business scenarios: You should be able to build complex models of multiple, linked
    business scenarios across different business, process, and subject-area
    domains, using such key features as strategy maps, ensemble modeling , and
    champion-challenger modeling.
  • Incorporate multiple information types into models: You should be able to develop models
    against multiple information types, including unstructured content and
    real-time event streams, while leveraging state-of-the-art algorithm in
    sentiment analysis and social network analysis.
  • Leverage multiple statistical algorithms and approaches in models: You should be able to develop models
    using the widest, most sophisticated range of statistical and mathematical
    algorithms and approaches, including regression, constraint-based
    optimization, neural networks, genetic algorithms, and support vector
    machines.
  • Apply multiple metrics of model quality and fitness: You should be able to score and validate
    model quality using multiple metrics and approaches, including quality
    scores, lift charts, goodness-of-fit charts, comparative model evaluation,
    and auto best-model selection.
  • Employ multiple variable discovery and assessment approaches: You should be able to build and
    validate models using various approaches for variable discovery,
    profiling, and selection, including decision trees, feature selection,
    clustering, association rules, affinity analysis, and outlier analysis.

How is this different from predictive analytics as usual? Traditionally,
most predictive modeling specialists focus on the latter three capabilities:
statistical algorithms and approaches, model quality and fitness, and variable
discovery assessment. Most models are built in narrowly scoped business or
subject domains—such as customer analytics for marketing campaign
management—and only against structured data sources (such as relational
tables). Traditionally, few predictive analytics projects have entailed modeling
of multiple business scenarios across diverse domains–such as sales,
marketing, customer service, manufacturing, and supply chain– though in the
real world these business processes are often quite interconnected. Also, many data
mining initiatives fail to incorporate information from unstructured sources—such
as text in call-center logs—though this content may be as important as what
comes relational databases and other structured sources.

It’s very important to build multi-scenario predictive models against
complex information sets, but becoming a fully predictive enterprise demands
much more. To instrument your organization for maximum predictive power, you
should also tool your advanced analytics to support the following capabilities:

·        
DW-integrated data preparation: To speed up and standardize the most
time-consuming predictive modeling project tasks, you should be able to
leverage your existing data warehouse, extract transform load, data quality,
and metadata tools to support a full range of data preparation features. These
features include the ability to discover, acquire, capture, profile, sample, collect,
collate, aggregate, deduplicate, transform, correct, augment, and load
analytical data sets.

·        
Deep application and middleware integration: To deliver models deeply into whatever heterogeneous
SOA-enabled platform you happen to use, your predictive analytics tool should deploy
on and/or integrate with a wide range of enterprise applications, middleware,
operating platforms, and hardware substrate. You should be able to deploy
models seamlessly into your data warehouse, business intelligence, online
analytical processing, data integration, complex event processing, data quality,
master data management, and business process management environments. And to
play well in your SOA, your predictive modeling tools should support application
programming interfaces, languages, tools, and approaches such as Web services,
Java, C++, and Visual Studio, as well as emerging languages such as
SQL-MapReduce and R.

·        
Consistent cross-domain model governance: To avoid fostering an unmanageable glut of
myriad models, your predictive analytics solution should support a wide range
of tools, features, and interfaces to support life-cycle governance of models
created in diverse tools. At the very least, your tools should enable model
check in/check-out, change tracking, version control, and collaborative
development and validation of models. To realize this promise, it should
support a full range of tools, standards, and interfaces for import and
embedding of models from other tools, as well as export and sharing of models to
other environments.

·        
Flexible model deployment: To execute modeling functions–such as
data preparation, regression, and scoring—on the widest range of data
warehouses and other platforms, your tools should support in-database or
embedded analytics. And to scale to the max, your predictive analytics tools should
deploy models to massively parallel data warehouses, software-as-a-service environments,
and cloud computing fabrics.  Your
advanced analytics tools should also support development of application logic
in open frameworks—such as MapReduce and Hadoop—to enable convergence of data
mining and content analytics in the cloud.

·        
Rich interactive visualization: To deliver their precious
payload—actionable intelligence—your advanced analytics tools should support
interactive visualization of models, data, and results. Ideally, you should be
able to visualize all of this in your preferred business intelligence tool, or
in the predictive modeling vendor’s integrated visualization layer. Of course,
you have every right to expect the full range of visualization
techniques–histograms, box plots, heat maps, etc.—regardless of who provides
the visualization layer.

As you can see, this
goes well beyond data mining as usual. Forrester has a slightly different
perspective on the development of the predictive analytics market than you’re
likely to get from other sources. We see a robust, flexible, SOA-enabled data
mining tools as the centerpiece of advanced analytics for fully predictive
enterprises. The competitive stakes are too great for businesses to take the traditional
silo-mired approach when implementing this mission-critical technology.

What do you think?